0.09/0.10 % Problem : Vampire---4.8_1494 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.09/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 1440 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 180 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Jul 3 12:30:08 EDT 2023 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.41 Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qzmFdcasPM/Vampire---4.8_1494 0.15/0.41 # Version: 3.1pre001-ho 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.15/0.42 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh4l with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.42 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.42 # ho_unfolding_6 with pid 1679 completed with status 0 0.15/0.42 # Result found by ho_unfolding_6 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.15/0.42 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.42 # No SInE strategy applied 0.15/0.42 # Search class: HUUPS-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores 0.15/0.42 # new_ho_10 with pid 1684 completed with status 0 0.15/0.42 # Result found by new_ho_10 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.15/0.42 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.42 # No SInE strategy applied 0.15/0.42 # Search class: HUUPS-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.15/0.42 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.15/0.42 0.15/0.42 # Proof found! 0.15/0.42 # SZS status Theorem 0.15/0.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.15/0.42 thf(decl_22, type, x: nat). 0.15/0.42 thf(decl_23, type, y: nat). 0.15/0.42 thf(decl_24, type, z: nat). 0.15/0.42 thf(decl_25, type, pl: nat > nat > nat). 0.15/0.42 thf(decl_26, type, esk1_0: nat). 0.15/0.42 thf(satz19a, conjecture, ~(![X5:nat]:(((pl @ x @ z)!=(pl @ (pl @ y @ z) @ X5)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qzmFdcasPM/Vampire---4.8_1494', satz19a)). 0.15/0.42 thf(satz5, axiom, ![X1:nat, X2:nat, X3:nat]:(((pl @ (pl @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)=(pl @ X1 @ (pl @ X2 @ X3)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qzmFdcasPM/Vampire---4.8_1494', satz5)). 0.15/0.42 thf(satz6, axiom, ![X1:nat, X2:nat]:(((pl @ X1 @ X2)=(pl @ X2 @ X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qzmFdcasPM/Vampire---4.8_1494', satz6)). 0.15/0.42 thf(m, axiom, ~(![X5:nat]:(((x)!=(pl @ y @ X5)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qzmFdcasPM/Vampire---4.8_1494', m)). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(~(![X5:nat]:(((pl @ x @ z)!=(pl @ (pl @ y @ z) @ X5))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz19a])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X20:nat]:(((pl @ x @ z)!=(pl @ (pl @ y @ z) @ X20))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X14:nat, X15:nat, X16:nat]:(((pl @ (pl @ X14 @ X15) @ X16)=(pl @ X14 @ (pl @ X15 @ X16)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[satz5])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:nat]:(((pl @ x @ z)!=(pl @ (pl @ y @ z) @ X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X1:nat, X2:nat, X3:nat]:(((pl @ (pl @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)=(pl @ X1 @ (pl @ X2 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X18:nat, X19:nat]:(((pl @ X18 @ X19)=(pl @ X19 @ X18))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[satz6])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_10, plain, ((x)=(pl @ y @ esk1_0)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m])])])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:nat]:(((pl @ y @ (pl @ z @ X1))!=(pl @ x @ z))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X2:nat, X1:nat]:(((pl @ X1 @ X2)=(pl @ X2 @ X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_13, plain, ((x)=(pl @ y @ esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:nat]:(((pl @ y @ (pl @ X1 @ z))!=(pl @ x @ z))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X1:nat]:(((pl @ y @ (pl @ esk1_0 @ X1))=(pl @ x @ X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_13])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), ['proof']). 0.15/0.42 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.15/0.42 # Parsed axioms : 10 0.15/0.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses : 10 0.15/0.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4 0.15/0.42 # Processed clauses : 11 0.15/0.42 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.15/0.42 # ...subsumed : 0 0.15/0.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 11 0.15/0.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.15/0.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.15/0.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.15/0.42 # Backward-rewritten : 1 0.15/0.42 # Generated clauses : 15 0.15/0.42 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13 0.15/0.42 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.15/0.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.15/0.42 # Paramodulations : 15 0.15/0.42 # Factorizations : 0 0.15/0.42 # NegExts : 0 0.15/0.42 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.15/0.42 # Total rewrite steps : 9 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check models : 0 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.15/0.42 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.15/0.42 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.42 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 6 0.15/0.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3 0.15/0.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1 0.15/0.42 # Negative unit clauses : 2 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 0 0.15/0.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7 0.15/0.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 7 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 5 0.15/0.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0 0.15/0.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.15/0.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1 0.15/0.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 17 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 17 0.15/0.42 # Condensation attempts : 11 0.15/0.42 # Condensation successes : 0 0.15/0.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 468 0.15/0.42 0.15/0.42 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.003 s 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.001 s 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.004 s 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1596 pages 0.15/0.42 0.15/0.42 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.003 s 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.003 s 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.006 s 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages 0.15/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting 0.15/0.42 EOF